One Week Retention of Classical Eyeblink Conditioning in Pre‐Weanling and Weanling Rats

WSU CORE Repository

 

One Week Retention of Classical Eyeblink Conditioning in Pre‐Weanling and Weanling Rats

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Collins, Shannon N.
dc.contributor Deek, Feras J.
dc.contributor Claflin, Dragana
dc.contributor.author Wood, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-22T15:29:09Z
dc.date.available 2012-05-22T15:29:09Z
dc.date.created 2012-04-13
dc.date.issued 2012-04-13
dc.identifier.other celebration_abstract12_wood_s
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2374.WSU/6117
dc.description.abstract Classical eyeblink conditioning (EBC) in rats becomes robust around postnatal day (PND) 24 with dramatic development occurring between PND 17 (pre-weanling) and PND 24 (post- weanling). Past developmental studies of conditioning at PND 17 showed no behavioral evidence of learning. However, facilitation of learning occurred when the same animals were re-tested on Day 20, compared to age-matched controls being conditioned for the first time (Stanton et al., 1998). This suggests a carry-over effect from Day 17 to 20. The present study explores the nature of this carry-over while also extending the findings over a one week test- retest period. Groups of pre-weanling (PND 17) and post-weanling (PND 24) rats were randomly assigned into one of three different exposure conditions: Paired, Context, or Shock. Paired exposure consisted of repeated trials of a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) followed by a periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus (US). Context exposure consisted of being put in the test situation with no stimulus presentations, while Shock exposure consisted of 90 shock-only presentations. One week later all animals received paired CS-US presentations. As expected, there was no learning evident in the Paired group at PND 17. When re-tested at PND 24, all three groups of animals showed similar rates of learning. The facilitation previously observed for paired training between PND 17 and 20 was not present between PND 17 and 24, suggesting it is a short-lived phenomenon. In contrast, the post-weanling Paired group showed significant learning at PND 24 with little change upon retesting at PND 31, thus indicating strong retention of learning. The Context and Shock control groups showed no learning at PND 24, but rapid learning at PND 31, matching that of the Paired group. Together, these data suggest that prior exposure to testing context or aversive stimuli does not influence conditioning over a one week retention interval.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Wright State University en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Celebration of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities en_US
dc.rights.uri http://www.wright.edu/web/copyright.html
dc.subject Wood, Sarah en_US
dc.subject Collins, Shannon N. en_US
dc.subject Deek, Feras J. en_US
dc.subject Claflin, Dragana I. en_US
dc.subject Wright State University. Department of Psychology en_US
dc.title One Week Retention of Classical Eyeblink Conditioning in Pre‐Weanling and Weanling Rats en_US
dc.type Presentation en_US
dc.permissions World
dc.publisher.digital Digital Services Department, Wright State University Libraries en_US
dc.date.digitized 2012-04-13
dc.publisher.OLinstitution Wright State University en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
celebration_abstract12_wood_s.pdf 139.0Kb application/pdf Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CORE


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

About

Links